The Exceeding Banality of Burning Projects

-
Listening to a podcast recently I heard a project manager say of himself that he is often given the project that are "already on fire." I cringed, because I have made that comment myself quite a few times. Too often it was in interviews that I made the boast. It's not really that remarkable for a project manager to be handed a project on fire and asked to make something of it. 

There are many reasons for a project to be "going south," and it's going to show time, cost, scope, and possibly, ultimately, quality.

One such project for me was a cloud migration. A major data center was being shut down and all the services hosted there had to be migrated to the cloud. When I got involved it was already badly behind schedule, and extra cost had been incurred in renewing the lease on a data center's space while also paying for cloud services. What had happened was a project manager had laid out a very solid plan for doing the migration in waves. It was going to involve a great deal of coordination with multiple stakeholders, but all in a day's work for a dedicated project manager. However, she didn't get the chance, as there was a reorg and she was laid off. 

The engineering team was left without a project manager for about a year and a half, when I came along. The team lead quit to take a job elsewhere right around the same time, so sorting out status was tricky. After a couple of weeks of review the new lead and I determined that some services had been incorrectly checked off as migrated when in fact the migrations had only begun. Meanwhile, the engineers had been left to their own devices with the stakeholders, so they emailed everyone they could think of and worked with those who responded.

The result of this spotty lack of stakeholder management was that the neatly organized waves existed on in the project plan. Applications and services were being migrated from all of them at the same time, based as I said already on who responded to an engineer's email asking to work together to migrate.

There was nothing particularly heroic in my involvement. I worked with the team from an Agile perspective, helping them organize in a Scrumban fashion, and helped set some order in their approach to the migration. After a time I rolled off the project for other duties, and another project manager picked up the torch and carried it home. The data center was successfully shut down without a loss of any major services under her watch. 

This story has repeated a number of times in my career, and it's just part of the job. Shifting priorities and resources, poor initial planning or a lack of guidance altogether can run projects off the rails or straight into the ground. Time stretches on, costs balloon, and focused scope is lost. Sometimes someone with some pull notices, makes noise about it, and a project manager is assigned. It could be any of us. Perhaps there are specialists, but for the most part I really think it could be any available project manager. 

Work in this profession long enough and it will seem a regular occurrence to you as well. Projects are always on fire. Just try to be really good at keeping your cool while trying to get them under control. You don't have to be special to be the right person for the job. 

Popular posts from this blog

The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor and Power in the Age of Automation (Book Review)

-
Image
In his compelling book, " The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation ," Carl Benedikt Frey offers a sweeping examination of the historical and ongoing impact of mechanization and automation on society. Starting with the onset of the first Industrial Revolution, Frey deftly navigates through the evolution of technology up to the modern age of artificial intelligence, presenting a nuanced view of how technological innovations have reshaped labor markets and power dynamics. Frey categorizes technological innovations into two types: enabling technologies, like the typewriter, which enhance worker productivity without displacing the labor force, and replacing technologies, such as robotic machinery in factories, which eliminate certain job roles altogether. This distinction forms the backbone of Frey’s analysis, as he explores the varying implications of each type of technology on different segments of the workforce. The book traces a historical patter...
Read more

The Dual Faces of Technology: Enhancing and Replacing Jobs

-
Image
Automation has been on my mind a lot lately, more immediately due to a book I read , but also because of the looming reality of artificial intelligence. To understand what's involved, making the distinction between replacing technologies and enabling technologies is crucial. As we traverse the timeline of the 20th century, we observe how each type of technology has distinctly influenced employment. Automated technologies have transformed industries by replacing manual labor with machines. Consider the automated switchboards introduced in the early 20th century. Previously, telephone operators manually connected calls using physical connectors on a switchboard. With the advent of automated switchboards in the 1920s and 1930s, many of these jobs were eliminated as calls were routed through electromechanical systems. Similarly, in agriculture, the introduction of mechanical harvesters like the combine harvester in the 1930s drastically reduced the need for manual labor. These machine...
Read more

Streaming Services Pivot: From Growth to Retention and Beyond

-
In a recent episode of the Retention Zone podcast (embedded below), media industry veteran Titus Bicknell shed light on the changing priorities within the video streaming sector. Having worked alongside Bicknell at AMC Networks for nearly two years, I have always held a deep appreciation for his insights, which offer a window into an industry undergoing significant shifts from aggressive subscriber acquisition to nuanced strategies aimed at retaining valuable customers. The Evolution of Subscriber Priorities Bicknell, a pioneer of mobile video in the early 2000s, has witnessed first-hand the explosive growth of the streaming market, particularly between 2015 and 2020. However, the focus, he notes, has crucially shifted. It’s no longer about amassing subscribers indiscriminately. "It's not any sub is a good sub," he remarked during the podcast. This reflects a deeper understanding within the industry that not all subscribers are beneficial for the business's bottom li...
Read more