Agile Misinterpreted: Setting the Record Straight on Deadlines

-

The realm of publishing, like many other industries, has not been immune to the sweeping changes brought about by technology and changing work dynamics. Among these changes is the adoption of Agile methodologies, particularly in teams that intersect with technology and project management. I'd like to share a personal anecdote that highlights the misconceptions about Agile, even within progressive industries like publishing, and why it's essential for leaders to understand its real value.

A Step Back in Time

Years ago, I found myself working at various publishing companies. At one such company, an opportunity arose that would have been a significant milestone in my career – leading an Agile transformation for an engineering team. They were keen to evolve into a full-fledged scrum team, and the head of engineering was supportive of the initiative.

However, the journey hit an unexpected bump. One day, while discussing the transformation with the head of engineering, my then-new boss overheard our conversation. Hailing from another publishing company, he had been appointed to lead the PMO after his predecessor's departure. On the surface, he seemed to fit right into the contemporary business landscape. But his mindset? It was, disappointingly, reminiscent of the 1980s or 1990s.

Misunderstanding Agile

Shortly after our casual conversation, this boss pulled me aside. With a firm tone, he stated that our PMO, being in a publishing company, couldn't "do Agile." His primary concern was deadlines. To him, Agile seemed incompatible with the commitment to deadlines we had to our stakeholders.

I attempted to explain the essence of Agile. At its core, Agile doesn't signify an abandonment of deadlines. Instead, it's a dynamic way for teams to manage their tasks efficiently. With the collaboration of project managers, product managers, and scrum masters, an Agile team can elaborate on their work, assign story points, and realistically map out their goals within a given timeframe.

For those unfamiliar, story points are not direct representations of time. Instead, they offer a gauge of the effort involved in terms of complexity and difficulty. This can be subsequently translated into time estimates. Sadly, my explanation was cut short, as my boss firmly believed in his viewpoint. Feeling stifled and undervalued, I decided to move on from the company soon after.

Final Reflections

This incident from over a decade ago remains poignant. It underscores a pressing issue: the need to understand that Agile doesn't translate to "lazy," "sloppy," or "unpredictable." As technology continues to reshape industries, it's crucial for leaders to remain open-minded, continuously learn, and adapt. I often wonder if my former boss ever updated his understanding of Agile, especially given its prevalence in modern tech environments.

In closing, embracing Agile, or any other methodology for that matter, requires more than superficial knowledge. It demands genuine understanding, adaptability, and a commitment to fostering a collaborative environment where teams can thrive.

Popular posts from this blog

The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor and Power in the Age of Automation (Book Review)

-
Image
In his compelling book, " The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation ," Carl Benedikt Frey offers a sweeping examination of the historical and ongoing impact of mechanization and automation on society. Starting with the onset of the first Industrial Revolution, Frey deftly navigates through the evolution of technology up to the modern age of artificial intelligence, presenting a nuanced view of how technological innovations have reshaped labor markets and power dynamics. Frey categorizes technological innovations into two types: enabling technologies, like the typewriter, which enhance worker productivity without displacing the labor force, and replacing technologies, such as robotic machinery in factories, which eliminate certain job roles altogether. This distinction forms the backbone of Frey’s analysis, as he explores the varying implications of each type of technology on different segments of the workforce. The book traces a historical patter...
Read more

The Dual Faces of Technology: Enhancing and Replacing Jobs

-
Image
Automation has been on my mind a lot lately, more immediately due to a book I read , but also because of the looming reality of artificial intelligence. To understand what's involved, making the distinction between replacing technologies and enabling technologies is crucial. As we traverse the timeline of the 20th century, we observe how each type of technology has distinctly influenced employment. Automated technologies have transformed industries by replacing manual labor with machines. Consider the automated switchboards introduced in the early 20th century. Previously, telephone operators manually connected calls using physical connectors on a switchboard. With the advent of automated switchboards in the 1920s and 1930s, many of these jobs were eliminated as calls were routed through electromechanical systems. Similarly, in agriculture, the introduction of mechanical harvesters like the combine harvester in the 1930s drastically reduced the need for manual labor. These machine...
Read more

Streaming Services Pivot: From Growth to Retention and Beyond

-
In a recent episode of the Retention Zone podcast (embedded below), media industry veteran Titus Bicknell shed light on the changing priorities within the video streaming sector. Having worked alongside Bicknell at AMC Networks for nearly two years, I have always held a deep appreciation for his insights, which offer a window into an industry undergoing significant shifts from aggressive subscriber acquisition to nuanced strategies aimed at retaining valuable customers. The Evolution of Subscriber Priorities Bicknell, a pioneer of mobile video in the early 2000s, has witnessed first-hand the explosive growth of the streaming market, particularly between 2015 and 2020. However, the focus, he notes, has crucially shifted. It’s no longer about amassing subscribers indiscriminately. "It's not any sub is a good sub," he remarked during the podcast. This reflects a deeper understanding within the industry that not all subscribers are beneficial for the business's bottom li...
Read more